The Problem With “Worldwide Coverage”

In computer parlance, worldwide meaning, also known as global reach or hyper globally, is the ability to reach or be able to reach a user on a global level. Worldwide, in cartography or geology, an area beyond the boundaries of its physical location. For instance, all of the planets in our solar system or the universe. It is a term sometimes used to indicate a certain segment of the globe or ocean where there is very little land or that includes bodies of water such as oceans and seas.

worldwide

With the use of new technology, many topics come to light in the world today; however, few have the power and popularity as that of the topic of worldwide protests. The events of recent months around the world have shown how citizens are angered with governing bodies over issues like genetically modified foods, stem cell research, and climate change. There have been rogue hacking of government websites and emails, rioting, and worse, which shocked the world. When these things occur worldwide, it becomes a very controversial and polarizing issue. Many individuals and nations are trying to find ways to resolve this crisis, and one way to do so is to come up with a new definition of what the word “world” means.

One solution which has been created by scholars who study this issue worldwide is the use of a single term to mean both the physical location of a nation-state, and the boundaries of that country’s international coverage. By creating a single encompassing term that encompassed both the technological advances that have taken place, and the political struggles that occur within the boundaries, the argument for the single term, “worldwide coverage,” was then brought forth. The U.S. was not able to come up with a universal solution for this problem, and has thus chosen to limit its global coverage by excluding China from its hemisphere, although it still defends its territorial integrity and refuses to allow the free movement of people within its borders. In all, “worldwide coverage” may be a better approach to defining world coverage than either singling out China separately, or limiting the scope to the hemispheres of Europe, Asia, or North America.